Lawyer for Harvey Weinstein accuser “baffled” by dropped intercourse assault cost

Lawyer for Harvey Weinstein accuser

The New York Metropolis Police Division says it’s investigating allegations {that a} detective improperly coached a witness in the course of the Harvey Weinstein investigation. Lucia Evans claims Weinstein pressured her to carry out oral intercourse on him in 2004, however new info revealed on Thursday casts doubt on Evans’ story.

In response, prosecutors deserted a part of the sexual assault case in opposition to Weinstein. Evans was among the many first ladies to publicly accuse Weinstein of sexual assault within the New Yorker final fall. In Could, she grew to become one among ultimately three ladies to type the inspiration of the legal case in opposition to him. However in a shocking reversal now 5 months later, Evans’ legal professional says the district legal professional has deserted her shopper.

Lawyer Carrie Goldberg says she has little question that when Evans was an aspiring actress in 2004, Weinstein pressured her to carry out oral intercourse on him at his Manhattan workplace.

“Why now? I am baffled,” Goldberg advised “CBS This Morning: Saturday” co-host Michelle Miller. “She’s been steadfast for the final 15 years that she was forcibly sexual assaulted by Harvey Weinstein. There is no writing in existence that refutes that.”

However in a letter to the protection unsealed on Thursday, Manhattan prosecutors disclosed {that a} good friend of Evans advised an NYPD detective in February that Evans agreed to carry out oral intercourse on Weinstein in change for the promise of “an performing job.” The letter says the NYPD detective responded to the good friend’s claims by telling her that she had “no obligation to cooperate.” The detective denies the allegations, however acknowledges he “failed to tell” the district legal professional’s workplace of “vital particulars” of the interview. However Goldberg says Evans’ good friend modified her story.

“It was my shopper that launched this third celebration as a witness…however you need to perceive that my shopper’s model of occasions was corroborated by this girl after which it wasn’t till she was questioned together with her father lawyer on the telephone that out of the blue there was an about-face… We’ve to have a look at her motives right here… this was 15 years in the past for this girl additionally,” Goldberg mentioned.

After a decide dismissed the cost Thursday, Weinstein emerged from the Manhattan courthouse together with his legal professional Ben Brafman.

“Sexual assault is a critical crime. However falsely accusing somebody of sexual assault can be a really critical crime,” Brafman mentioned.

Goldberg pins the blame on the district legal professional.

“I actually consider that the DA made the errors of their failure to analyze proof and witnesses correctly…I imply this has nothing to do with Lucia’s claims,” Goldberg mentioned.

The Manhattan assistant DA says she stays assured within the total case in opposition to Weinstein. The New Yorker stands by its reporting. Weinstein had beforehand pleaded not responsible to the six intercourse crimes he is been charged with and has denied all allegations of sexual abuse. He nonetheless faces 5 remaining counts, all of which his legal professional can be searching for to have dismissed.

© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.