On Thursday, Vogue revealed an article concerning the disappointment of white girls voters, after exit polls from Tuesday’s midterm elections confirmed that the demographic primarily voted in favor of GOP candidates. Now, Fox & Associates is expressing its personal opinion concerning the piece, saying that the article is “exceptional in its misogyny.”
Beneath a headline that requested “Why Do White Girls Preserve Voting for the GOP and Towards Their Personal Pursuits?,” the Vogue article aggregated knowledge from the latest election that illustrates white girls’s overwhelming help for Republican candidates who’re towards important girls’s points like reproductive rights and equal pay.
“As positive as black girls have confirmed themselves to be the often-underappreciated spine of the Democratic occasion, white girls voters are establishing themselves as maddeningly, confusingly … unsisterly,” the article said, whereas additionally asking, “Are they so invested in their very own white privilege that they merely don’t care about different girls? Are they parroting their Republican husbands and/or brainwashed by Fox & Associates?”
Fox & Associates is combating again by saying that this speculation is sexist. The community introduced in Tammy Bruce, a Fox Information contributor and the president of the Unbiased Girls’s Voice, who stated that the piece’s outlook isn’t something new. Actually, she says that it’s an argument that’s been utilized by misogynists and sexists time and time once more.
“Girls have all the time been attacked once they don’t conform, or once they’ve been totally different or once they’ve thought for themselves,” Bruce defined. “The irony of girls who stand there and current themselves as supposedly the champion of girls, condemning girls for making selections that finest suited them, after I thought that was the complete level of feminism.”
And he or she isn’t the one one making this argument. Actually, folks throughout Twitter are sharing conflicting ideas on the Vogue article.
Who writes these things? Girls don’t assume & vote the identical. Many ladies are fortunately pro-life and prioritize the financial system above contraception once they vote. Terrible @voguemagazine article: Will White Girls Voters Ever Be Who We Need Them to Be? https://t.co/rNppdYTqAK
— Patrice Lee Onwuka (@PatricePinkFile) November 9, 2018
We at Vogue rejoice range! Now, girls who disagree with us, get again in your field and cease being so unsisterly. https://t.co/82oxL1wF6h
— Natalie Johnson (@nataliejohnsonn) November 9, 2018
My gender and race doesn’t dictate my vote! I help the very best pursuits of my household! I resent the implications that I should be uneducated and unable to kind my very own knowledgeable choices! https://t.co/D2vov8Lz4C
— Jenni Charneski (@JenCaclsRN) November 9, 2018
Nonetheless, there are loads who argue that reproductive selection and paid depart are universally within the curiosity of girls.
You’d assume what *ought to* be common to all girls shouldn’t be supporting killing your individual infants whereas they’re in your womb. However that is not the case, now could be it… https://t.co/Sz7I6ZoCFW
— Ericka Andersen (@ErickaAndersen) November 9, 2018
It is a v. good learn for progressive white girls puzzling out how finest to achieve non-progressive white girls. We will not hand over on or ‘cancel’ them so it is good meals for thought. Will White Girls Voters Ever Be Who We Need Them to Be? https://t.co/W3XoUEoZZK through @voguemagazine
— Lily Burana 🗽 (@lilyburana) November 8, 2018
Wonderful article! That is a lot deeper than any of us can think about. And these are solely a few of the causes, but they’re legitimate causes all of us have to take to coronary heart.
There are deep psychological… https://t.co/scIYNCW3e5
— Jaynellen DanceCraft (@JaynellenDance) November 9, 2018
No matter which facet of the argument folks on social media agree with, the author of the Vogue piece, Michelle Ruiz, is now questioning the place her invite to share her logic on Fox & Associates was.
Learn extra from Yahoo Life-style: